تاثیر مدیریت عشایری بر تغییرات پوشش گیاهی مراتع سامانه عرفی دهنه سنگ لار

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار پژوهش، مؤسسه تحقیقات جنگلها و مراتع کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، تهران، ایران

2 محقق، مرکز آموزش و تحقیقات کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان تهران، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

با تغییرات ایجاد شده در نحوه مدیریت مراتع عشایری که نمود آن جایگزینی دولت در تنظیم تقویم کوچ و مدیریت مراتع با عشایر می باشد. نظر به محدودیت‌های نظام دولتی، موضوع امکان سنجی واگذاری مجدد این مسئولیت به عشایر و فراهم کردن زمینه نقش‌آفرینی آن‌ها در مدیریت مراتع به عنوان یکی از راهکارهای برون‌رفت از وضع نامناسب و ناکارآمد نظام مدیریت کنونی مطرح شده است. ازاین‌رو سازمان امور عشایر، مؤسسه تحقیقات جنگل‌ها و مراتع کشور و سازمان جنگل‌ها؛ مراتع و آبخیزداری کشور ورود به مسئله را از مسیر متکی به نتایج تحقیق امری منطقی تشخیص و پس از تشکیل جلسات متعدد ، مرتع ییلاقی دهنه سنگ لار طایفه هداوند به عنوان پایلوت انتخاب گردید تا تاثیر مدیریت عشایر و حمایت ارگانها از آنان بر تغییرات پوشش گیاهی در این منطقه مورد آزمون قرار گیرد. شاخص های مورد ارزیابی پوشش، ظرفیت، وضعیت، گرایش و درصد بهره برداری در دو مرحله قبل از ورود و پس از خروج عشایر از مراتع تعیین گردیدند. بدین منظور. نمایندگانی از سوی عشایر معرفی و اجرای پروژه در قالب تفاهم نامه 4 جانبه شماره 246/5/278 مورخه 23/1/95 مابین ارگانهای ذکر شده در فوق و نمایندگان عشایر منعقد گردید. مراحل مطالعاتی پروژه به شکل مدیریت تعریف شده بمدت 4سال از سال 1394 آغاز شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The effect of Co- management system on the vegetation in summer rangelands of Dahaneh- SAnghe Lar

نویسندگان [English]

  • A. Mohebbi 1
  • Rahman Sharifi 2
1 Rangeland Research Division, Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran
2 Research Center for Agriculture and Natural Resources, Tehran, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

by the replacement of the government in the management of rangelands with nomads. On the othr hand,considering the limitations of the government system, the issue of feasibility of reassigning this responsibility to the nomads and providing the ground for their role-playing in rangeland management has been proposed as one of the ways out of the inappropriate and inefficient situation of the current management system. For this, the Nomadic Affairs Organization, the Forests , Rangelands and Watershed Organization , Research Institute of e Forests and Range lands; considered it logical to enter the issue through research. After holding several meetings, the summer range lands of Laleh Vazhgon plain in Koohrang city were selected as a pilot, to test the impact of nomadic management and organization support on vegetation changes in this area. The evaluated indicators were, range lands capacity, range lands condition, trend and exploitation percentage in two stages before the arrival and after the departure of the nomads from the range lands. For this purpose. Representatives of the tribes introduced and implemented the project in the form of a quadrilateral memorandum No278/5/246 dated 95/1/23 between the above-mentioned organs and the representatives of the tribes. The study began in 2016 for 4 years. First, two plant types were separated in the area and the necessary evaluations were performed in each of them.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Transhumance
  • Nomadic Range lands
  • management
-Bajian, Gh., 2007. A review of pasture management in nomadic society in the past and present, changes, challenges and strategies. Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research, 14,(4): 524-538 (In Persian).
-Behzad, T., 2012. Grazing management. Forests, Rangelands and Watershed Management Organization, Rangeland Affairs Office, Forest, Range lands, Watershed Management Organization, 150p )In Persian).
-Bozorghi, M. and Ghorbani, M., 2015. Analyzing the stockholders, social power and net work analysis on the natural resources management, M.sc theses of combating desertification. Faculty of Natural Resources, Tehran University, Tehran, 165p )In Persian).
-Child, B. and Dalal-Clayton, B., 2004. Transforming approaches to CBNRM: Learning from the Luangwa experience in Zambia. In: McShane, T.O., Wells, M.P., (Eds). Getting Biodiversity Projects to Work: Toward more Effective Conservation and Development, New York, Columbia University Press, 25p .
-Ghorbani, M., Azarnivand, H., Mehrabi, A.A., Bastani, S., Jafari, M. and Naiebi, H., 2013. Network analysis, new paradigm in programming co operational management of natural resources. Rangelands and Watershed Management, 65(4): 568-553 (In Persian).
-Jones, B.T.B. and Murphree, M.W., 2004. Community-based natural resource management as a conservation mechanism: Lessons and directions. In: Child, B., (Eds). Parks in Transition: Biodiversity, Rural Development, and the Bottom Line, London, Earthscan, 42p.
-Mohebbi, A., Fayyaz, M. and Seyed Akhlaghi, S.J., 2017. Investigation of migration and rangeland management situation and feasibility study of its transfer to nomadic organizations (case study of Ardabil, Tehran, Khuzestan and Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari provinces). Final report of the project, Forest and Rangeland Research Institute, Tehran, 450p (In Persian).
-Mohebbi, A., Farzizadeh, Z. and Rosemary, B., 2020. Assessment of the management of tribal people Range lands on the bases of grazing license (Case study: Tribal people of Tehran, Ardabil, Chaharmahalo Bakhtiiari and Khozestan provinces). Under study project. RIFR, Tehran, 560p, Unpublished, (In Persian).
-Murphree, M.W., 2004. Communal approaches to natural resource management in Africa: From whence and to where?. Journal of International Wildlife Law and Policy, 7: 203-16.
-Nelson, F. and Agrawal, A., 2008. Patronage or participation? community-based natural resource management reform in Sub-Saharan Africa. Development and Change, 39(4): 557-85.
-Nomadic Affairs Management Site of Tehran Province, 2016. Available at: http://www.ashayertehran.ir (In Persian).
-Ostrom, E., 2007. A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(39): 151-187.
-Poissonnet, M., Brudo, V. and Dosso, M., 2006. La forêt protégée de Kakamega (Ouest Kenya) entre deux futurs immédiats: destruction annoncée ou gestion?. Cahiers Agricultures, 15(5): 409-15.
-Randrianalijaona, T.M., 2008. Gestion communautaire des ressources naturelles et développement durable, PhD, University of Antananarivo. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 165p.
-Vermeulin, C., 1997. Problématique de la décentralisation des forêts communautaires en forêt dense humide, Sud Est Cameroun, The African Rainforest and the Conservation of Biodiversity Workshop, Limbé, January, pp. 17-24.
-Yousefi, M. and Behbahani, N., 2014. Sustainable management of natural resources based on participation of local communities (successful experience of international project- RFLDL South Khorasan, Sarayan). Availabe at: http://www.nrskh.ir/?p=298 (In Persian).