مقایسه جذب عناصر کادمیوم و روی در دو گونه اکالیپتوس

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناس ارشد بیابان زدایی، دانشکده کویر شناسی ، دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران

2 استادیار گروه جنگلداری مناطق خشک، دانشکده کویرشناسی، دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران

3 استادیار گروه جنگلداری مناطق خشک، دانشکده کویرشناسی، دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران.

چکیده

گیاه‌پالایی یکی از روش‏های نوین در حذف آلاینده‏ها به‌شمار می‏آید. این تحقیق با هدف مقایسه میزان جذب فلزات سنگین کادمیوم و روی توسط دو گونه اکالیپتوسEucalyptus microtheca  و Eucalyptus camaldulensis انجام شد. نهال‏های شش‏ماهه و یک‏دست اکالیپتوس برای اعمال تیمار کادمیوم (غلظت‏های 5، 10 و 15 میلی‌گرم به کیلوگرم) و روی (غلظت‏های 1، 3 و 10 میلی‌گرم به کیلوگرم ) در نظر گرفته شد. برای انجام آزمایش از 18 نهال از هر گونه استفاده گردید. سپس از برگ، ریشه و ساقه هر نهال در سه تکرار جداگانه نمونه‌برداری شد. عصاره‏گیری نمونه‌ها با استفاده از روش هضم اسیدی انجام و غلظت عناصر با استفاده از دستگاه ICP-OES اندازه‌گیری شد. نتایج نشان داد که جذب روی بین برگ‏های دو گونه میکروتکا و کامالدولنسیس با میانگین 6/518 و 5/426 و همچنین بین ریشه‏های آنها با میانگین 2/476 و 2/382 اختلاف معنی‏داری وجود داشت. اما ساقه‏ها در دو گونه تفاوت معنی‏داری در جذب روی نشان ندادند. همچنین میزان جذب  کادمیوم در دو گونه میکروتکا و کامالدولنسیس به‌ترتیب با میانگین 9/124 و 7/179 در برگ‏ها و 8/435 و 7/399 در ریشه‏ها تفاوت معنی‏داری را نشان داد. به‌علاوه اینکه دو گونه اکالیپتوس در سطوح کم در جذب روی و کادمیوم خاک اختلاف چندانی باهم نداشته اما با افزایش غلظت روی (از 1 به 3 میلی‌مول) و کادمیوم (از 10 به 15 میلی‌مول)، E. microtheca نسبت بهE. camaldulensis  بهتر عمل کرده است. با توجه به استفاده از دو گونه فوق در جنگل‌کاری‏ها با هدف گیاه‏پالایی، گونه E. microtheca، کارایی بهتری را در جذب کادمیوم و روی نشان داد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Comparative evaluation of Cd and Zn uptake by two eucalyptus species

نویسندگان [English]

  • M. Dehghan 1
  • A. Moshki 2
  • M. Mollashahi 3
چکیده [English]

Nowadays, phytoremediation is considered as a new technique to remove a variety of contaminants from the environment. The present study was conducted to evaluate and compare the uptake rate of heavy metals such as cadmium and zinc by two species of eucalypt including Eucalyptus microtheca and E. camaldulensis. For this purpose, the uniform 6-months seedlings of Eucalyptus were selected from the nursery of Golestan agricultural and natural resources research and education center. Eighteen seedlings of each E. microtheca and E. camaldulensis species were subjected to the heavy metals treatment, three concentrations for each elements of Cd (5, 10, 15 ppm) and Zn (1, 3, 10ppm).In total108 samples were taken from leaf, root and stem of each seedling in three replicates. Dry acid digestion method was used for samples extraction. The concentrations of heavy metals in the samples were measured using ICP-OES. The results revealed that Zn content significantly differs between leaves and roots of two species with an average of 518.6, 426.5for leaves and 476.2, 382.2 for roots in E. microtheca and E. camaldulensis, respectively. In contrast, there was no significant difference between stems of two species in terms of Zn content. Furthermore, Cd content in leaves and roots of two species showed significant differences with an average of 124.9, 179.7 for leaves and 435.8, 399.7(unit?) for roots, respectively. Under low concentration of heavy metals in the soil, no significant difference was observed between two species. However, increasing heavy metal concentration in soil (Zn from 1 to 3 mM and Cd from 10 to 15 mM) demonstrated higher efficiency in E. microthecarather than E. camaldulensis. These findings suggest that in general, in the wide use of two mentioned eucalyptus species in forestation projects for phytoremediation, the E. microthecawould have higher efficiency than E. camaldulensis in terms of Cd and Zn absorption.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • EUCALYPTUS MICROTHECA
  • Eucalyptus camaldulensis
  • heavy metals
  • Pollution
  • phytoremediation
Alizadeh, S.M., Zahedi Amiri, G., Savaghebi-Firoozabadi, G., Etemad, V., Shirvany, A and Shirmardi, M., 2012. Influence of soil amendment on cadmium accumulation responses in one-year old Populus alba L. seedling. Iranian Journal of Forest, 3(4): 355-366.
-Arriagada, C.A., Herrera, M.A., Garcia-Romera, I., and Ocampo, J.A., 2004. Tolerance to Cd of Soybean (Glycine max) and Eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus) Inoculated with Arbuscular Mycorrhizal and Saprobe Fungi. Symbiosis, 36:1-15.
-Asgari Lajayer, h., Moteshare Zadeh, B., Savaghebi Firoabadi, GH. and Hadian, J., 2014. Effect of Cu and Zn on concentration and absorption of micro elements (Cu, Zn, Fe, Mn) and macro elements (P) on medicine plant (Satureja hortensis L.) in greenhouse condition. Journal of Greenhouse Science and Culture, 19(5): 95-111. 
-Assareh, M.H., Shariat, A., and Ghamari-Zare, A., 2008. Seedling response of three Eucalyptus species to copper and zinc toxic concentrations. Caspian Journal Environmental Science and Technology, 6 (2): 97-103.
- Balsberg-Pahlsson, A.M. 1989. Toxicity of heavy metals (Zn, Cu, Cd, Pb) to vascular plants. A literature review. Water Air Soil Pollutants, 47: 287-319.
-Barati, S., and Mirghafari, N., 2012. Spatial Distribution of Chromium, Cobalt and Nickel in the Surface Soils of Hamadan Province. Journal of Natural Environment, Natural Resource of Iran Journal, 65(3): 283-295.
-Bhati, M. and Singh. G., 2003. Growth and mineral accumulation in Eucalyptus camaldulensis seedlings irrigated with mixed industrial effluents. Bioresource Technology, 88:221-228.
-Burken, J., Vroblesky, D.  and Balouet, J.C., 2011. Phytoforensics, Dendrochemistry and Phytoscreening: New green tools for delineating contaminants from past and present. Environmental Science & Technology, 45(15): 6218–6226.
-Chahouki, M.A., 2010. Data analysis on research of natural resource using Spss software. print 1, Jahad University Press, Tehran, 310pp. 
-Chehregani, A., and Malayeri, B., 2007. Removal of heavy metals by native accumulator plants. Chemosphere, 63: 811- 817.
-Clements, S., Plamegren, M.G., and Kramer, U., 2002. Along way ahead: understanding and engineering plant metal accumulation. Trends in Plant Science, 7: 309-316.
-Coupe, S.J., Sallami, Kh., and Ganjian, E., 2013. Phytoremediation of heavy metal contaminated soil using different plant species. African Journal of Biotechnology, 12(43): 6185-6192.
-Dushenkov, S., and Kapulnik, Y., 2000. Phytofilitration of metals. In: Raskin, I., Ensley, B.D. (Eds.), Phytoremediation of toxic metals – Using plants to clean-up the environment. Wiley, New York, pp. 89–106.
-Gichner, T., Patkova, Z., Szakova, J., and Demnerova, K., 2006. Toxicity and DNA damage in tobacco and potato plants growing on soil polluted with heavy metals. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 65: 420-426.
-Kabata-Pendias, A. 2011. Trace elements in soils and plants. Fourth edition, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, New York, 505 pp
-Kamalpour, S., Motesharezadeh, B., Alikhani, H. A., and Zarei, M., 2014. Effects of some biotic factors in lead phytoremediation and phosphorous uptake by Eucalyptus (Eucalyptus camaldulensis). Iranian Journal of Forest, 5(4); 470-457. 
-Levy, DB., Redente, EF., and Uphoff, GD., 1999. Evaluating the phytotoxicity of Pb–Zn tailings to big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii Vitman) and switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.). Soil Science, 164:363–375
-Mattina, M.J.I., Lannucci-Berger, W., Musante, C., and White, J.C., 2003. Concurrent plant uptake of heavy metals and persistent organic pollutants from soil. Environmental Pollution, 124: 375-378.
-Mughini, G., Alianiello, F., Benedetti, A., Mughini, L., Gras, M.A., and Salvati, L., 2013. Clonal variation in growth, arsenic and heavy metal uptakes of hybrid Eucalyptus clones in a Mediterranean environment. Agro forest System, 87: 755-766.
-Pulford, I.D. and Watson, C. 2003. Phytoremediation of heavy metal-contaminated land by trees- a review. Environment International. 29: 529-540.
-Rad, M.H., Sardabi, H., Soltani, M., and Ghelmani, S.V., 2010. Comparison of different eucalyptus species and provenances in respect to their vegetative growth, irrigated by wastewater of Yazd City of Iran. Proceedings of Second Seminar on: the Position of Water Reuse and Effluents on Water Resources Management: Applications in Agriculture and Landscape Irrigation, 20 October, Mashhad, Iran, Abstracts: 105-106.
-Riddle-Black, D. 1994. Heavy metal uptake by fast growing willow species. In: Aronsson, P., Perttu, K. (Eds.). Willow vegetation filters for municipal wastewaters and sediments: A biological purification system. Proceeding of a study tour, Conference and workshop in Sweden. Swedish University of Agricultural Science, Section of short rotation Forestry, Rapport 50, 5-10: 133-144.
-Romheld, V. and Marschner, H., 1991. Function of micronutrients in plants. In: Mortvedt, J.J., Shuman, L.M. and Welch, R.M. (Eds), Micronutrients in Agriculture. Published by Soil Science Society America, Inc. Madison, Wisconsin, USA. pp, 297-328.
-Sardabi, H., Saleheh Shoushtari, M.H., Banj Shafiei, SH., Jafari, A.A., Toghraie, N., Shariat, and Assareh, M.H., 2013. Investigation on potential of few eucalypt species for absorbing pollutants and reserv-ing them in their leaves. Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 21 (2): 357-372. 
-Shariat, A., Assareh, M.H., and Ghamari-Zare, A., 2008. Phytoremediation ability of Eucalyptus camaldulensis on Pb, Cd and Cu. Journal of Plant Researches, 12(3): 18-36.
-Shariat, A., and Assareh, M.H., 2008. Effects of different levels of heavy metals on seed germination and seedling growth of three Eucalyptus species. Iranian Journal of Rangland and Forests Plant Breeding and Genetic Research, 14 (1): 38-46.  
-Soares, C.R.F.S., Grazziotti, P.H., Siqueria, J.O., Carvaiho, J.G., and Moreira, F.M.S., 2001. Zinc toxicity on growth and nutrition of Eucalyptus maculate and Eucalyptus urophylla in nutrient solution. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira , 36: 339-348.
-Victor Nenman, D., N. Danboyi NImyel, and Ishaya Ezekiel, D., 2012. The Potentials of Eucalyptus camaldulensis for the Phytoextraction of Six Heavy Metals in Tin – mined Soils of Barkin Ladi L.G.A. of Plateau State, Nigeria. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 2 ( 2): 346-349.