Survey of ectomycorrhizal fungi associated with oak trees in the forests of Lorestan province, Iran

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Researcher, Lorestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Khorramabad,, Iran

2 Assistant Prof., Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran

10.22092/ijfrpr.2025.366032.1629

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Ectomycorrhizal symbiosis is established between groups of Basidiomycete and Ascomycete fungi and several forest tree species in temperate, Mediterranean, and semi-warm regions, playing an important role in the establishment, performance, and development of trees in these areas. This type of symbiosis is fundamental in improving plant health by protecting against biotic and abiotic stresses and by improving soil structure. Ectomycorrhizal fungi play a key role in the growth and nutrient uptake of oak trees. Studies have shown that oak seedlings benefit from ectomycorrhizal symbionts, and their nutrient absorption, especially in nutrient-poor soils, increases. These fungi form a network with plants and help oak seedlings overcome nutrient limitations in unfavorable environments. The presence of a diverse and abundant ectomycorrhizal community is essential for the restoration and sustainability of oak forests and highlights the complex relationship between these fungi and oak trees. The aim of this study was to identify the existing morphotypes in the oak forests of Lorestan province and to statistically evaluate the populations of these ectomycorrhizal fungi.
Methodology: To investigate the ectomycorrhizal fungi associated with oak trees in the forests of Lorestan province, six natural oak habitats (Shorab, Pol Keshkan, Grit, Kashraf, Chenar Bagali, and Nozhian) were selected. After recording the geographic information of each site, 15 trees were randomly selected in each habitat. Soil samples along with root fragments were collected from the rhizosphere (0–30 cm depth) of each oak tree and transferred to the laboratory. The percentage of dead roots, non-mycorrhizal roots, mycorrhizal roots, as well as the number of morphotypes and fungal taxa were determined, and the data were statistically analyzed using SPSS software.
Results: In the studied sites, the percentage of ectomycorrhizal roots ranged from 10% to 56%, and the identified morphotypes mainly belonged to the two genera Cenococcum and Hygrophorus. Statistical analysis showed that the differences in the percentage of dead roots, non-mycorrhizal roots, mycorrhizal roots, and the type and number of symbiotic fungal taxa among the studied sites were highly significant (P< 0.01), but the differences in the number of morphotypes were not significant (P> 0.05). A significant negative correlation was found between the number of taxa and the percentage of dead roots (r= −0.33), and between the percentage of mycorrhizal roots and dead roots (r= −0.37) (P< 0.05). There was also a strong negative correlation between the percentage of non-mycorrhizal roots and the number of taxa (r= −0.64, P< 0.01), and a significant negative correlation between the percentage of non-mycorrhizal roots and the number of morphotypes (r= −0.44, P< 0.05). Among the studied sites, the average number of isolates per tree in the Kashraf area was in the superior group (Group A), while the Chenar Bagali area was ranked in the lower group (Group C) (P< 0.05). Similarly, the average number of morphotypes per tree in the Kashraf area was in the superior group (Group A), while the Chenar Bagali and Nozhian areas were classified in the lower group (Group C) (P< 0.05).
Conclusion: The morphotypes identified across different sites were partly similar, but the percentage of mycorrhizal roots varied among the studied areas. Overall, the average number of isolates ranged from 1.47 to 18.20 per ten 10-cm root segments, and the average number of morphotypes per site ranged from 0.94 to 1.60. The differences in the number of isolates per root in different areas may be due to environmental conditions such as temperature, humidity, soil type, and light, which have a great influence on the growth and establishment of these microorganisms. In addition, the type and diversity of oak trees may be associated with different levels of fungal abundance, which can affect ectomycorrhizal populations. Soil nutrients, especially nitrogen and phosphorus, can also influence ectomycorrhizal fungal populations. Moreover, human activities and changes in oak habitats affect their ecosystems and modify ectomycorrhizal populations. Competition among soil microorganisms, including the presence of different fungal and bacterial species, may also contribute to these variations and affect ectomycorrhizal populations. Since no prior study has been conducted on the identification and diversity of ectomycorrhizal populations in the Zagros oak forests, this study can provide part of the basic information in this field.
 

Keywords

Main Subjects


  • Agerer, R., 2020. Ectomycorrhizae: Diversity and Ecological Role. Fungal Diversity, 105(1): 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-020-00528-x
  • Azcón-Aguilar, C. and Barea, J.M., 1997. Arbuscular mycorrhizas and biological control of soil-borne plant pathogens–an overview of the mechanisms involved. Mycorrhiza, 6(6): 457-464.
  • Bessette, A. E., Roody, W. C., Bessette, A. R. and -Dunaway, D. L., 2007. Mushrooms of the southeastern United States. Syracuse University Press. 373p.
  • Brundrett, M.C., 2002. Coevolution of roots and mycorrhizas of land plants. New phytologist, 154(2): 275-304.
  • Davis, M., Sommer, R. and Menge, J., 2012. Field guide to mushrooms of western North America. University of California Press. Vol. 106, 488p.
  • Dell, B., 2002. Role of mycorrhizal fungi in ecosystems. CMU Journal, 1(1): 47-60.
  • Dietz, S., Kuo, H. and Rainey, G.B., 2022. Ectomycorrhizal fungi enhance soil structure and carbon retention: Implications for forest management. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 164: 108419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.,2022.108419
  • Fortin, J.A., Plenchette, C. and Piché, Y., 2015. Les Mycorhizes (second ed.). Versaillles: Inra. p. 10. ISBN978-2-7592-2433-3.Corporation, 650 p.
  • Itoo, Z.A. and Reshi, Z.A., 2013. The multifunctional role of ectomycorrhizal associations in forest ecosystem processes. The Botanical Review, 79: 371-400.
  • Jahanbazi, H., Iranmanesh, Y., Talebi, M., Shirmardi, H.A., Mehnatkesh, A.M., Pourhashemi, M. and Habibi, M., 2020. Effect of physiographic factors on absorption of essential nutritional elements of the leaf in Brants oak (Quercus brantii ) affected by decline (Case study: Helen forest, Chaharmahal & Bakhtiari province). Journal of Plant Research (Iranian Journal of Biology), 33(3): 734-748.
  • Kottke, I. and Nebel, M., 2005. The evolution of mycorrhiza-like associations in liverworts: an update. New Phytologist, pp.330-334.
  • Lehto, T., 1992. Mycorrhizas and drought resistance of Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr. I. In conditions of nutrient deficiency. New phytologist, 122(4): 661-668.
  • Li, J., Zhang, H. and Zhang, Y., 2023. Ectomycorrhizal fungi enhance root structure and function of oak trees under salt stress. Tree Physiology, 43(2): 152–163. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpac028
  • Martin, A., Casimiro, A. and Pais, M.S., 1997. Influence of mycorrhization on physiological parameters of micropropagated Castanea sativa Mill. plants. Mycorrhiza, 7(3): 161-165.
  • Metzler, S. and Metzler, V., 1992. Texas mushrooms: a field guide. University of Texas Press. 18, 350p.
  • Nikolaou, N., Angelopoulos, K. and Karagiannidis, N., 2003. Effects of drought stress on mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal Cabernet Sauvignon grapevine, grafted onto various rootstocks. Experimental Agriculture, 39(3): 241-252.
  • Nilsen, E.T. and Orcutt, D.M., 1996. Physiology of plants under stress. John Willey and Sons. Inc., New York. Mycorrhiza, 7: 161-165.
  • Patel, S., Yadav, S. and Singh, A., 2021. Stress-Responsive Metabolites in Ectomycorrhizal Oak Trees Under Salinity Stress. Journal of Plant Physiology, 258: 153364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2020.153364
  • Porcel, R., Aroca, R. and Ruiz-Lozano, J.M., 2012. Salinity stress alleviation using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 32(1): 181–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-011-0029-x. S2CID8572482
  • Read, D.J., 1992. The Mycorrhizal Mycelium DJ Read. Mycorrhizal functioning: an integrative plant-fungal process. Chapman and Hall. 1102: 102-110.
  • Remy, W., Taylor, T.N., Hass, H. and Kerp, H., 1994. Four hundred-million-year-old vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 91(25): 11841-11843.
  • Sagheb-Talebi, K., Pourhashemi, M. and Sajedi, T., 2013. Forests of Iran. Springer Science.152p.
  • Simard, S.W., Perry, D.A., Jones, M.D., Myrold, D.D., Durall, D.M. and Molina, R., 1997. Net transfer of carbon between ectomycorrhizal tree species in the field. Nature, 388(6642): 579-582.
  • Smith, A.H., 1975. A field guide to western mushrooms. University of Michigan Press, 264p.
  • Smith, S. E. and Read, D. J., 2010. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. Academic Press.
  • Smith, S.E. and Read, D., 2008. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis Third Edition Introduction. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis, 605p.
  • Svenningsen, N. B., Watts-Williams, S. J., Joner, E. J., Battini, F., Efthymiou, A., Cruz-Paredes, C., Nybroe, O. and Jakobsen, I., 2018. Suppression of the activity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi by the soil microbiota. The ISME journal, 12(5): 1296-1307.
  • Tuning, R., Bender, P. and Hartmann, P., 2022. Ectomycorrhizal fungi enhance nutrient availability in saline soils: Implications for oak tree growth. Forests, 13(1): 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13010034
  • Wang, B. and Qiu, Y.L., 2006. Phylogenetic distribution and evolution of mycorrhizas in land plants. Mycorrhiza, 16(5): 299-363.
  • Wang, Q., Liu, X. and Zhang, Y., 2023. The Role of Ectomycorrhizal Fungi in Carbon Cycling and Climate Change Mitigation. Journal of Ecology, 111(1): 123-135. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13750